弘扬法律的公平、公信精神:陪审制度之审视——兼论中外陪审制度的建构与实践  

Enlighten the Law Spirit of Equity and Public Faith:A Survey of the Jury System——Also on the Structure and Practice of China’s Jury System and Those of Foreign Countries

作　　者：施玮[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽巢湖学院,安徽巢湖238000 [2]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2010年第7期62-71,共10页Pacific Journal

摘　　要：现代陪审制度是国家司法机关吸收普通公民参加审判活动的重要制度,是现代司法民主和公民权利的保障制度。其有效实施体现了人民主权,保证了公平正义,弘扬了法律的公平、公信精神。但由于法律文化传统的差异,不同时期不同国家其运行也会有很大差异。本文在考察域外英美陪审团制度经验的基础上,将我国人民陪审员制度与英美陪审团制度进行比较分析,揭示我国陪审制度存在的不足,结合《关于完善人民陪审员制度的决定》,就人民陪审员制度的重构进行反思。Modern jury system is an important system of adjudication under which the state judiciary invites grassroots citizens to participate in the judiciary. It is a safeguard system of modern judicial democracy and civil rights. Effective implementation of the jury system embodies the sovereignty of the people, ensures fairness and justice, enlighten the law spirit of equity and public faith. However, due to differences in legal and cultural traditions, the operation of the jury system will be very different in different periods of time in different countries. On the basis of studying Anglo - American jury system, we do comparative analysis about the system of people＇s assessors and Anglo- American jury system, revealing the shortcomings of our system of Peopleg Assessors. Combine with the Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People g Congress on Improving the System of Peopleg Assessors, this paper do some reflection on the reconstruction of the system of people＇s assessors.

关 键 词：公平 公信 人民陪审员制 陪审团制 借鉴 

分 类 号：D621.5[政治法律—政治学]