检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国电力工程顾问集团华北电力设计院工程有限公司,北京市100120
出 处:《电力建设》2010年第9期74-77,共4页Electric Power Construction
摘 要:分别对敦煌、上海2地区采用高倍聚光和双轴平板(晶体硅组件配双轴跟踪器)的光伏电站的发电成本进行了比较。结果表明,在当前市场条件下,敦煌地区高倍聚光的发电成本比双轴平板高40.2%,上海地区高倍聚光的发电成本比双轴平板高109.5%。高倍聚光的发电成本明显高于双轴平板,2者之间的差距与当地的直接辐射强度有关,直接辐射越弱,2者之间的差距越大。A comparison is made in this paper of the power-generating cost of photovoltaic plants in Dunhuang and Shanghai region installed with high concentration photovoltaic system(HCPV) and crystalline silicon module photovoltaic (PV)system with 2-axis trackers.The result shows that under current market condition,the power-generation cost of HCPV is 40.2% higher than that of the photovoltaic system with 2-axis trackers in Dunhuang region and 109.5% higher in Shanghai region,indicating that the power-generation cost of HCPV is substantially higher than that of PV with 2-axis tracker.The difference between them is related with the direct irradiation intensity in the region,and the weaker the direct irradiation is,the higher their differences are.
关 键 词:高倍聚光 双轴平板 晶体硅组件 发电成本 光伏发电 辐照强度
分 类 号:TM615[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28