检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈秉喆[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学卫生管理与教育学院,北京100069
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2010年第5期53-55,共3页China Health Law
摘 要:医疗侵权损害赔偿诉讼中,举证责任的分配可能对判决结果产生重大影响,关乎到能否有力地保护医患双方合法权益,因而成为医学界与法学界共同关注的热点问题之一。2002年4月1日起施行的《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》,是我国第一次以司法解释的形式规定医疗侵权诉讼适用"举证责任倒置"。本文中,笔者将主要针对《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》实施后对"医疗侵权诉讼适用举证责任倒置"的影响以及今后立法趋势等方面做出阐释与论述。In the actions for medical tort damages, the burden of responsibility of proof citation is able to have important impact on the judgment in this kind of actions, which is also related to whether the legal rights of both hospitals and patients can be protected effectively. So how to assign responsibility of proof citation becomes the hot topic in medicine and law field. Prescription from the Supreme People's Court to the Civil Lawsuits Evidence, issued on 1st April 2002, is the first judicial interpretation to set up the inversion for responsibility of proof citation in medical tort lawsuits in China. In this essay, the author expounds the impact on "the inversion for responsibility of proof citation in the actions for medical tort damages" and the legislative trend mainly after the implementation of Tort Liability Law of P.R.C.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15