检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张小勇[1,2] 盖起明[1,2] 薛强[1,2] 左明鲜[1,2] 邓洁 尹昵[1,2]
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院附属延安医院心内科 [2]云南心血管病医院,云南昆明650051
出 处:《昆明医学院学报》2010年第8期65-68,共4页Journal of Kunming Medical College
摘 要:目的评估心房下起搏消融房室结慢径的可行性与有效性.方法自2009年8月至2010年4月,有73例房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者入院接受射频消融术,其中62例慢快型AVNRT和1例慢慢型AVNRT患者(对照组)在窦性心律下进行慢径消融,6例快慢型AVNRT及另4例慢慢型AVNRT患者在持续心房起搏(心房起搏组)并保证快径1:1前传的情况下进行慢径消融.结果对照组和心房起搏组在放电次数、操作时间、急性期成功率方面比较差异无统计学意义,分别为(3.3±1.1)次vs(3.2±1.0)次、(63±21)minvs(59±19)min和100%vs100%,P>0.05,两种消融方法均未出现严重并发症.结论心房下起搏消融房室结慢径有效且可行,可作为治疗AVNRT的一种方法。Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow pathway under atrial pacing.Methods From August 2009 to Aapril 2010,73 patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT) were enrolled in this study.Among them,62 patients with slow-fast AVNRT and 1 patients with slow-slow AVNRT(control group) received cathter ablation of slow pathway under sinus rhythem,6 patients with fast-slow AVNRT and other 4 patients with slow-slow AVNRT(atrial pacing group) received cathter ablation of slow pathway under atrial pacing which ensure 1:1 conduction via the fast pathway.Results There were no significant difference between conroll group and atrial pacing group in the mean RF pulses applied per patient,operation time and acute success rate,which were(3.3 ± 1.1) vs(3.2 ± 1.0),(63±21) min vs(59±19) min and 100% vs 100% respectively(P〉0.05).No severe complications occurred in patients in both groups.Conclusion Atrial pacing during catheter ablation of the slow pathway is feasible and efficient,which can be an alternative approach to treat AVNRT.
关 键 词:射频消融 房室结折返性心动过速 慢径
分 类 号:R541.71[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28