鸡蛋、老虎和刽子手——认知悖论解析  

Egg,Tiger,and Hangman——Analyses on Epistemic Paradoxes

作　　者：黄斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学马克思主义理论教研部,重庆市400045

出　　处：《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第5期84-88,共5页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究2007年度规划基金项目"逻辑悖论研究"(07JA720016);项目负责人:黄斌

摘　　要：认知悖论的研究具有重要的哲学和逻辑意义。从哲学基本问题的视角去分析,对认知悖论的理解就可以豁然开朗。以"意料之外的鸡蛋"、"意料之外的老虎"和"刽子手悖论"三个悖论为例加以分析,可以发现其中的错误都根源于混淆了思维和存在,以及与思维和存在的区分相联系的两种"知道"("后知"和"预知")和两种"真"("反映真"和"预期真")的概念。Analyses on the epistemic paradoxes （paradox of knowledge or Knower paradox） are of great philosophical and logical significance.Analyzing the paradox from the angle of the basic question of philosophy advanced by Engels,we can have a clear understanding of the paradoxes.Taking three paradoxes （＂unexpected egg＂,＂unexpected tiger＂ and ＂unexpected hanging＂）as examples,the analyses show that the paradoxes come from the confusion of thinking and being,confusion of two kinds of knowledge,namely knowledge as reflection of reality and knowledge as prevision or reasoning,and confusion of two kinds of truth,namely the truth of reflection and truth of expectation.

关 键 词：认知悖论 思维与存在 后知 预知 反映真 预期真 

分 类 号：B815.3[哲学宗教—逻辑学]