第三代科技园区及意外发现管理研究——基于硅谷和玮壹科技园的比较分析  

The Third Generation Science & Technology Parks and Serendipity Management

作　　者：李小芬[1] 王胜光[2] 冯海红[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽合肥230026 [2]中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所,北京100190

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2010年第9期154-160,共7页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"创新经济下的联合治理机制研究-国家高新技术产业开发区管理体制改革探索"课题资助(项目编号:70803049)

摘　　要：以激发人的创造力为目标的第三代科技园区,对管理模式提出了新的现实需求。意外发现管理能最大限度地将创造成果转化为生产力,是顺应时代的管理模式。本文从社会网络的角度,解析了"强政府推动"和"自发形成"两类园区的演化路径。结论表明,二者都体现了意外发现管理的内涵,通过信任管理和提供便利的方式,促进隐性知识的传播,从而提高园区的创造氛围。但具体表现形式有差异,前者要求由政府建立某种机制以捕捉园区的创造思维;后者需要引导产业流和知识流的对接,其中风险投资承担了捕捉创造灵感的职能。The third generation science and technology parks are people-centered, which aim to stimulate people＇s creativity. Thus, new management models should meet the practical needs. Serendipity management can transform the creative ideas into practice farthest, which is an effective model going with the current of the times. Government-promotion and self-made science and technology parks have different evolutionary paths to go to the third generation ones. Case studies of the two types of science and technology parks are introduced in the perspective of social networks. It is proved that both of them have serendipity management, which is to facilitate the dissemination of tacit knowledge based on trust management. However, the former requires the governments to establish a mechanism to capture the creative ideas, while the latter focus on the connection of knowledge and industry. Especially, venture capital has the function to capture the creative inspiration in self-made science and technology parks.

关 键 词：第三代科技园区 意外发现管理 强政府推动 自发形成 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]