检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈培琴[1] 郭惜珍[1] 黄旭华[1] 纪馥芳[1] 陈妙华[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属汕头医院护理部,广东汕头515031
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2010年第18期2806-2807,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的探讨医院手术器械优效的清洗方法。方法改进医院手术器械清洗制度和流程,并将18套共1080件手术器械分为3组各6套360件,分别接受直接机洗、酶泡+机洗、预洗+酶泡+超声+机洗进行器械,评价清洁合格率并进行对比。结果直接机洗组、酶泡+机洗组、预洗+酶泡+超声+机洗组的合格率分别为81.1%、92.8%、96.9%,3组间及两两组间的差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论预洗+酶泡+超声+机洗的器械清洗方法的清洁效果明显优于其他两种方法,规范的器械清洗制度,高素质的操作人员、优效的清洗方法和流程、合适清洗剂的选择、手工清洗和机械清洗的有机结合,是提高清洗质量的重要手段。OBJECTIVE To explore the effective medical instruments cleaning methods.METHODS The cleaning system and procedure of medical instruments were improved,a total of 1080 pieces of medical instruments were divided into 3 groups,each group with 360 pieces.Direct machine washing,enzyme dipping+machine washing and pre-washing+enzyme dipping+ultrasound+machine washing were treated to the 3 groups respectively.The passing rates of the 3 groups were evaluated.RESULTS The passing rates were 81.1%,92.8% and 96.9% respectively in the 3 groups.the difference among the 3 groups was statistically significant(P0.01).CONCLUSION The effect of pre-washing+enzyme dipping+ultrasound+machine washing cleaning method is remarkably superior to other two methods.Standard cleaning system,highly qualified manipulation staff,effective cleaning methods and procedure,proper selection of disinfectant and hand-washing combined with machine cleaning are important measures to improve the cleaning quality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117