检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁鹏宇[1]
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2010年第5期38-47,共10页Law and Social Development
摘 要:公法权利理论与德国国家形态的变迁息息相关。从"威权国家"到"自由法治国家",二战后演进至"社会法治国家",私人在公法上的权利也随之从无到有、从弱到强,公法权利范围与内容也不断充实强化,并与行政审判制度的革新发展相互配合,成为服务于人民的自由和福祉的重要理论渊源和制度保障。但是,作为传承大陆法系行政法理论的中国行政法学界,对于公法权利的基本原理和实践价值依然较为陌生,也并未将其作为架构行政法理论体系的基础性概念。因此,有必要对这一最具传统法释义学精神的"权利话语"进行系统的解构和评析,以判断对公权理论进行借鉴和移植的可能性。The theory of public law rights develops with the innovation of the form of state in Germany.The public law rights of individual created and grow from state of authority,freedom state rule of law,to social state rule of law after the World War II,and became a crucial theoretical basis and institutional safeguard of people's liberty and welfare.However,this notion is still strange to Chinese scholars in administrative law,thus have not taken it as the basic notion of framing administrative law system.It is necessary then to introduce this "discourse of rights" with traditional legal spirit and to judge the possibility of reference and transplant the theory of public law rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28