检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:艾佳慧[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院,南京210093
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2010年第5期68-81,共14页Law and Social Development
摘 要:根据海瑞定理I内含的制度逻辑,结合宏观的结构变迁模型与微观行动者视角,不仅可以从社会成本和社会结构维度构造一个纠纷类型框架图,更能从历史和司法功能转换的角度展示中国法院调解"复兴"的社会结构原因和政治原因。基于司法效率原则和前后贯之的微观行动者视角,中国的法院调解应该在区分审级和案件类型的基础上进行必要的调审分离并回归调解最初的本意,让当事人拥有真正的调解选择权和程序主控权。Begin from a framework map of typology of disputes,with the Hai Rui's Theorem I and in the perspective of micro actor,this essay analyzed the social reason that mediation revives in today's China and its consequence.The author holds that,if the idea of mediation in justice influences the society of China,the nature of courts,judges and justice in China could change.Based on the principle of Judicial efficiency and in the perspectives of micro actor,it is suggested that China's mediation in courts should be in the way of separating mediation and justice,bringing mediation to its original status,allowing the parties have the right to choose and controlling the process of mediation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229