检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭小燕[1] 吴妙莉[1] 古金燕[1] 张莓[1]
机构地区:[1]广东药学院附属第一医院肝胆外科,广东广州510080
出 处:《现代临床护理》2010年第8期71-72,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨两种宣教方法对肝豆状核变性患者饮食治疗的影响。方法选择2009年6-11月本院肝豆状核变性患者46例,随机分为参与组22例和指导组24例,指导组患者采用常规的健康教育方法,由责任护士全程指导患者的饮食;参与组在常规健康教育的基础上让患者参与制订饮食计划,并制订饮食表。比较两组患者对饮食知识的知晓率及饮食合理率。结果参与组患者饮食知识知晓率及合理率高于指导组(均P<0.05)。结论参与型的健康教育方式能调动肝豆状核变性患者学习饮食知识的积极性,提高患者对饮食知识的知晓率及饮食的合理性。Objective To study the effects of two health education methods on the dieting habits of hepatolenticular degeneration(HLD)patients.Methods We choose 46 HLD patients in our hospital from June to November 2009 and randomly divide them into two groups:instruction group and participation group.Dieting planning of the patients in the instruction group was decided only by the primary nurses based on the traditional health education method.Patients in the participation group were involved in dieting planning,in addition to the conventional method.We compared the rates of knowing dietary knowledge and dietary reasonableness between the two groups.Result The rates of knowing dietary knowledge and dietary reasonableness were both higher than those of instruction group(P〈 0.05).Conclusion The active participation in health education can motivate the HLD patients to learn more dietary knowledge and improve the rates of knowing dietary knowledge and dietary reasonableness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145