检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李姿姿
机构地区:[1]中央编译局世界社会主义研究所
出 处:《社会科学》2010年第9期23-32,共10页Journal of Social Sciences
摘 要:自1990年代以来,"新社会风险"作为社会政策领域的一个新视角逐渐兴起。"新社会风险"视角认为,后工业社会带来的服务业崛起、妇女就业增多以及人口老龄化等结构变化导致社会出现大量新的社会风险,对以传统社会风险为主要考虑的战后福利制度提出了巨大挑战。新社会风险视角是对以降低福利支出、缩小国家作用为中心的"新自由主义"和"福利紧缩"政治的超越,它对转换社会政策研究方法、开辟新的研究领域起到了重要的推动作用。与此同时,关注新社会风险的起源及其带来的社会影响,对转型时期我国的社会保障制度建设也将起到积极的借鉴意义。Since 1990s,the concept of New Social Risks has attracted wide attention by western social policy researchers. This research approach advocates that the new social risks resulted from the post-industrial society have brought about a lot of challenges to the traditional social welfare system that is based on post-war social condition and developed to meet mainly the need of male 'breadwinner'. By going beyond new-liberalism and welfare state retrenchment,this research angel plays a very important role in transferring the research method and opening new research area in social policy study. Examining the origin and impact of new social risks on western welfare reform is also very instructive to China's ongoing social protection system reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31