检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《青岛海洋大学学报(自然科学版)》1999年第2期243-248,共6页Journal of Ocean University of Qingdao
基 金:国家自然科学基金;国家攀登计划B项目
摘 要:于1997年5~8月在山东海阳养虾场运用陆基围隔实验生态学方法,研究了罗非鱼—对虾、海湾扇贝—对虾、缢蛏—对虾、罗非鱼—缢蛏—对虾4种混养系统中滤食性动物对浮游生物群落的影响。结果表明:滤食性动物的滤食作用降低了浮游植物生物量和甲藻在浮游植物中的比例;混养罗非鱼和扇贝使浮游植物群落的多样性增加,而混养缢蛏却使它下降;罗非鱼优先滤食大型桡足类,使小型浮游动物增加,从而提高了浮游动物的总生物量,而扇贝则优先滤食浮游动物的小型种类;由于罗非鱼和缢蛏生态灶的互补性,罗非鱼—缢蛏—对虾混养能更全面、有效地利用浮游生物资源。This paper deals with the impact on plankton community of filter feeding animals: Taiwan red tilapia, bay scallop and constricted tagelus polycultured with peneid shrimp. The study was conducted in a shrimp farming pond from May to August, 1997 with the enclosure experimental method. The following results were obtained: (1) The filter feeding animals decreased the phytoplankton biomass, especially the biomass of the red tide causing form, Prorocentrum micanssom. (2) Tilapia and scallop increased the diversity index of phytoplankton communitites, but tagelus played a negative role. (3) Tilapia preferred larger copepods, so the biomass of smaller ones and hence the total zooplankton was increased. (4) Scallop depressed the biomass of copepods. Based on the above results, the authors are of the opinion that all the filter feeding animals studied are useful as a polyculture component in shrimp ponds for improveing the utilization rate of input feed and the water quality, but tilapia and tagelus polycultureed together with shrimp can use plankton resources more completely and effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222