检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:米兰[1] 李叶扬[1] 林伟华[1] 李罡[1] 孙敬恩[1]
机构地区:[1]暨南大学医学院附属广州市红十字医院,广东广州510220
出 处:《创伤外科杂志》2010年第5期437-439,共3页Journal of Traumatic Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨负压封闭引流术(vacuum sealing drainge,VSD)治疗电烧伤创面的疗效。方法选择134例电烧伤患者,分为VSD组和换药组进行回顾性分析。结果 VSD组创面清洁时间为5~10天,Ⅱ期手术皮片优成活率96.7%。对照组创面清洁时间10~20天,皮片优成活率69.9%。两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论 VSD对电烧伤创面清洁作用和术后皮片成活率较传统换药效果好,为创面修复创造了良好的植皮条件。Objective To investigate the effect of vacuum sealing drainage(VSD) technique on the management of electrical burn wounds.Methods A retrospective analysis was done for 134 electrical burned patients.They were divided into experimental group(VSD) and control group(dressing).The curative effect between two groups were observed and compared.Results The wounds cleaning time was 5-10 days,skin graft survival rate was 96.7% in experimental group,while the wound cleaning time was 10-20 days,skin graft survival rate was 69.9% in control group.There was significant difference between two groups(P0.01).Conclusion The effect of VSD in cleaning wound is better than that of traditional therapy.It could create a good condition for skin grafting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15