检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鞠贞会[1] 王秉莲[1] 张琳[1] 赵明明[1]
机构地区:[1]荣成市人民医院消化内科,山东荣成264300
出 处:《护理学报》2010年第4期67-69,共3页Journal of Nursing(China)
摘 要:目的探讨对需要经口腔插管洗胃的患者,采用牙垫辅助屏气法留置胃管的效果。方法将180例患者按随机数字表分为对照1组、对照2组和观察组各60例。对照1组不用牙垫,在指导患者张口发"a"音的同时屏气,随即将胃管插入;对照2组应用口置牙垫的方法插管,不做屏气动作;观察组应用口置牙垫后指导患者张口发"a"音的同时做屏气动作,顺势将胃管插入。结果观察组插胃管1次成功率高,插管时间短、患者痛苦小、患者愿意接受,3组经比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对需要经口插管洗胃的患者,采用牙垫辅助屏气方法插管成功率高,插管时间短、患者痛苦小,有力配合了抢救,减轻了护理工作量。Objective To explore the effects of dental pad assisting breath holding in patients undergoing oral-gastric intubation.Methods A total of 180 patients were randomly and equally divided into control group 1,control group 2 and observation group.The control group 1 did not employ dental pad and was guided to say "a" at the same time of breath holding,and thereupon received gastric tube intubation;the control group 2 received dental pad but did not hold their breath;the observation group was guided to say "a" and held their breath with the assistance of dental pad,then underwent oral-gastric intubation.Results Single intubation in observation group had a higher success rate,shorter intubation duration,less pain and higher patient willingness to receive.The results of the three groups were statistically significant(P0.01).Conclusion For patients in need of gastric lavage,oral-gastric intubation with dental assisting breath holding is high in success rate,short in intubation duration and less in pain,which will strongly cooperate with the salvage and lower the nursing burden.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3