检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李綦通[1]
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第5期433-438,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
摘 要:"二战"之后,国际法层面的国际刑法虽然得到了快速的发展,但在国际法学界,对于国际刑法是否是"法"以及国际刑法是否具有强制力仍然存在争议。国际法层面的国际刑法是国际法的一个组成部分,国际法的效力依据也是国际刑法的效力依据。实在法是国际刑法的主要效力依据,而自然法目前也是国际刑法重要的效力依据。个人和国家都应该为国际犯罪承担刑事责任是国际刑法具有强制力的保证,是国际刑法特殊属性的体现。After the World War Ⅱ,the international criminal law was developed rapidly when viewing it in the category of international law.But,in the international academa of jurisprudence there are still arguments over the issue whether the international criminal law is truly a "law" and it is mandatory or not.The international criminal law is a constituent part of international law when viewing it is in the category of international law,and the ground for the validity of international law is the same to the international criminal law.Although the positive law is mainly the ground for the validity of international criminal law,the natural law plays the same important role in this respect.Both the individuals and the States should bear the criminal responsibility for their international crimes,which means that the international criminal law is jus cogens——the embodiment of the special attribute of international criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222