检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]怀化医学高等专科学校附属医院暨怀化市三医院普外科,湖南怀化418000
出 处:《医学临床研究》2010年第9期1710-1711,共2页Journal of Clinical Research
摘 要:[目的]分析比较腹腔镜胆总管切开纤维胆道镜取石T管引流术(LCHTD)与胆结石开腹手术(OCHTD)的临床效果.[方法]对2008年1月至2009年6月45例肝内外胆管结石病人施行LCHTD与同期OCHTD的45例病例进行对比分析.[结果]两组手术病人均治愈出院.术中出血量、胃肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间,LCHTD组明显优于OCHTD组(P〈0.01);而手术时间、带T管时间LCHTD组则长于OCHTD组(P〈0.05).[结论]腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术安全、有效,可行.[Objective] To analyze and compare the clinical effects of laparoscoplc video choledochoiberscopic hepatocholangiolithotomy Ttube drainage(LCHTD) vs open choledochoiberscopic hepatocholangiolithotomy(OCHTD)[Methods] Forty five cases of extra- and intra-hepatic bile duct calculi underwent LCHTD, and 45 cases as controls underwent CCHTD from Jan. 008 to June 2009. The effects of two groups were compared and analyzed. [Results] All the patients of two groups were cured to discharge from hospital. The intraoperative bleeding volume, time of gastrointestinal recovery and hospitalization time in I.CHTD group were much superior to OCHTD group( P〈0.01), but the operation time and the time of the patients with T-tube in LCHTD group were longer than those in OCHTD group( P〈0.05). [Conclusion] Laparoscopic choledoeholithotomy is safe, effective and feasible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145