检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第4期55-59,共5页Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究2007年度规划基金项目"宪政经济规范的基础研究"(07JA820042)
摘 要:传统经济法研究在经济学"帝国主义"的阴影之下,其发言权一直由经济学家所主导。但经济学理论中强烈的功利主义倾向使得经济法在追求正义的法治之道上渐行渐远。因此,经济法应当正本清源,从法律规则衍生的线索追溯自己的本源,追溯到宪法乃至更高的自然法则,不失为一种途径。在这一背景下提出的宪政经济正义,不仅强调对经济法进行宪政上升,而且强调对之进行正义的法理考量。罗尔斯的正义二原则以及布坎南的一致同意原则为我们认识宪政经济正义这一概念提供了很好的借鉴。Traditional economic law study is in the shadow of "economics imperialism", and its voice has been dominated by economists. But the strong utilitarian tendency in economic theory makes economic law deviate further and further in the pursuit of justice. Therefore, economic law should be radically reformed, and trace their own origins from the clue of law's naissance, dating back to the constitution and even the higher laws of nature is also a good way. The constitutional economic justice in this background not only emphasizes economic law's constitutional raise, but also emphasizes the jurisprudence considerations of justice. Rawls's two principles of justice and Buchanan's agreement principle provide a good reference for us to recognize the concept of constitutional economic justice.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.226.5