检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北医学》2010年第10期1210-1213,共4页Hebei Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果。方法:将在我院治疗的高血压脑出血患者60例随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组给予开颅穿刺引流术,观察组给予微创穿刺引流术。结果:观察组在手术时间、住院时间以及住院费用方面明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后观察组患者并发症总发生率为16.67%,对照组为36.67%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者死亡率为3.33%,对照组为26.67%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后第2天、第3天格拉斯哥评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果显著,临床医生应根据患者的病情合理选择应用。Objective: To investigate the effect of micro-injury stab drainage in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Method: The 60 cases with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage were divided into observing group and control group.The control group received the treatment of open skull drainage,and the observe group received the treatment of micro-injury stab drainage.Result: The time of operation,length of stay and cost of hospitalization in observing group were less than those of control group(P〈0.05).The complication rate was 16.67% in the observing group and 36.67% in the control group(P〈0.05).The dead rate was 3.33% in the observing group and 26.67% in the control group(P〈0.05).The scores of Glasgow at the second day and the third day in observation group were higher than those of control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion: The effect of micro-injury stab drainage in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage is obvious,so clinician should choose it according to the pathogenetic condition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3