博弈论的理性概念与理性的悖论  

Rationality in Game Theory and Paradoxes of Rationality

作　　者：谷飙[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南财经大学人文学院,成都611130

出　　处：《天津商业大学学报》2010年第5期40-43,共4页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"不完全信息博弈论的归纳概率逻辑基础研究"(08BZX0048)系列成果之一

摘　　要：博弈论的理性概念和经济学的理性概念是一脉相承的,通常被表述为期望效用最大化准则和占优准则。从形式上看,这些准则并不涉及自利性和利他性、个体理性和群体理性之间的关系。但是,将它们运用于不同主体之间的策略性互动时,会产生"理性选择的不合理性"的悖论。"纽科姆问题"表明,没有自利性的博弈论理性概念并没有摆脱经济学理性概念的矛盾。In game theory and economics, rationality is embodied in rational choices according to principle of maximizing expected utility and principle of domination. The forms of the two principles are neutral to egoism and altruism, individualism and collectivism, However, paradoxes of irrationality of rational choice can be found in interaction context. An analysis of Newcomb problem shows that the concept of rationality is contradictory in game theory as well as in economics.

关 键 词：博弈论 理性 悖论 

分 类 号：B819[哲学宗教—逻辑学]