中外围填海管理的比较研究  

Comparative Studies: Coastal Reclamation Management between China and Abroad

作　　者：孙丽[1,2] 刘洪滨[3] 杨义菊[1,2] 谭勇华[1,2] 王小波[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]国家海洋局第二海洋研究所,浙江杭州310012 [2]国家海岛开发与管理研究中心,浙江杭州310012 [3]中国海洋大学海洋发展研究院,山东青岛266003

出　　处：《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第5期40-46,共7页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家海洋局第二海洋研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(JG200825);国家海岛保护与管理专项经费专项资助(2011914);浙江省近海海洋综合调查与评价(908)专项资助(ZJ908-02-04)

摘　　要：将我国的围填海发展历史及管理现状分别与日本、荷兰、韩国进行对比分析,发现缺少具体的法律规范、分行业的海洋管理体制和重审批、轻规划的管理方式是我国围填海管理滞后的主要原因。建议制定专门的围填海相关法律,建立有效的海洋咨询、协调机构或组织,加强围填海总体规划和具体项目的设计指导,以实现我国海洋环境和资源的保护及合理有效地利用。This paper compares the development reclamation history and managerial situation in China to Japan,Netherlands and Korea.It finds that the primary causes for the lag in reclamation management are the penury of specific law or norms,the dispersive administrative functions among several sector authorities and the management mode which highlights examinations and approvals and belittles the plans.The paper suggests that the policies and regulations according to local conditions should be formulated;effective advisories and coordinated institutions or organizations should be built;the guiding works for general plans and specific items of reclamation should be strengthened.Then the marine environment and resources could be protected and rational used.

关 键 词：围填海 管理体制 日本 荷兰 韩国 

分 类 号：X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程]