检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘继军[1] 郑国柱[2] 赵炬才[1] 林道贤[2]
机构地区:[1]河南省人民医院骨科研究所,郑州450003 [2]中山医科大学孙逸仙纪念医院骨科
出 处:《中华骨科杂志》1999年第6期349-352,共4页Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
摘 要:目的 探讨液压扩张疗法对冻结肩的治疗价值,分析影响治疗效果的相关因素。方法 对43 例(44 肩)冻结肩进行了局麻下关节囊内液压扩张治疗,并对其中19 肩进行了扩张造影。结果 随访时间8 ~16 个月。根据作者拟定的冻结肩的分型及疗效评定标准,44 肩中优34 肩,良10肩。其中轻型7 肩疗效均为优;中型18 肩:优17 肩,良1 肩;重型19 肩:优10 肩,良9 肩。19 肩扩张造影结果显示∶扩张治疗后关节囊内显影有不同程度的改善,容积平均增加6 ml。结论 (1)液压扩张疗法是治疗冻结肩的有效方法,尤其对轻、中型患者疗效显著;(2) 对明显外伤或手术引起的冻结肩疗效可能不理想;(3) 操作技术是影响疗效的直接因素;(4)Objective To investigate the outcome of frozen shoulders treated by hydraulic pressure distension, and to analyse the factors affecting the results. Methods 43 cases with frozen shoulders (44 shoulders) were treated by hydraulic pressure distension, 19 shoulders were performed by distension arthrography. According to the authors criteria, the patients were divided into three groups, and three levels were designed to assess the effect. Results The follow up period ranged from 8 to 16 months. Excellent results were obtained in 34 shoulders, good in 10 shoulders.In the slight stiffness group (7 shoulders), excellent in 7,in the moderate group (18 shoulders), excellent in 17 and good in 1,in the severe group (19 shoulders),excellent in 10 and good in 9 . Distension arthrography of 19 frozen shoulders showed that average increase in capsular capacity was 6 ml. Conclusion Hydraulic pressure distension is a reliable and highly effective treatment for frozen shoulders in the slight or moderate stiffness group, but it was less effective for those in the severe stiffness group. A failed result was seen in the post traumatic stiff shoulders. The technique may be a factor affecting the results and the course of the illness does not seem to influence the results of the treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185