机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第一附属医院呼吸内科,南宁530021
出 处:《中华结核和呼吸杂志》2010年第9期688-692,共5页Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30860106);广西自然科学基金(2010GXNSFB013060),志谢 广西壮族自治区人民医院蓝娇医生提供流式细胞仪并帮助测定
摘 要:目的观察香烟暴露及断烟后大鼠Treg细胞的变化,探讨Treg细胞与断烟后大鼠肺部炎症反应和肺气肿持续存在的关系。方法将50只雄性Wistar大鼠按随机数字表法分为5组:健康对照组、香烟暴露组和断烟组,其中健康对照组和香烟暴露组又分为12周组(对照1组和实验1组)和24周组(对照2组和实验2组)。香烟烟雾暴露法建立大鼠肺气肿模型。HE染色观察大鼠肺气肿的改变,酶联免疫吸附法检测大鼠BALF中白细胞介素(IL-8)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平,流式细胞术检测大鼠外周血和肺实质中CD4^±Foxp3调节性T细胞(Treg细胞)比例,实时定量PCR法检测大鼠外周血和肺实质中Foxp3的mRNA表达。多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,组内两两比较采用SNK和Games—Howell检验。结果实验1组和实验2组平均内衬间隔(MLI)为(64.9±5.3)μm和(77.9±11.5)μm,均明显高于对照1组和对照2组的(39.0±3.8)μm和(40.3±2.7)μm,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01);断烟组MLI[(71.5±5.8)μm]介于实验1组和实验2组之间,但肺气肿程度较实验1组明显加重,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。实验1组和实验2组IL-8水平[(68±17)ng/L和(85±16)ng/L]及TNF-α水平[(14.1±1.8)ng/L和(20.1±8.7)ng/L]均明显高于对照1组和对照2组[(44±8)ng/L、(43±9)ng/L及(6.3±2.3)ng,/L、(5.8±1.6)ng/L],差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。实验1组和实验2组肺实质中CD4^+Foxp3^+Treg细胞[(6.6±0.8)%和(5.3±0.9)%]明显少于对照1组和对照2组[(9.0±1.0)%和(9.6±0.9)%],差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01);断烟组肺实质中CD4^+Foxp3^+Treg细胞[(7.2±0.6)%]与实验1组比较虽无明显减少,但未能恢复至正常水平。实验1组和实验2组肺实质中Foxp3的mRNA表达量(Objective To evaluate the expression of Treg in a cigarette smoke-induced rat model of emphysema and after smoking cessation in the rats. Methods Fifty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into control group 1 (12 weeks), control group 2 (24 weeks), smoke-exposure group 1 (12 weeks), smoke-exposure group 2 (24 weeks) and smoking cessation group, with 10 rats in each group. Alveolar airspace enlargement was observed by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. IL-8 and TNF-α levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were tested by ELISA. The proportion of CD4^+Foxp3^+Treg in peripheral blood and lungs of rats was determined by flow cytometry. The mRNA expression of Foxp3 was measured by real-time PCR. Comparisons of the data between different groups were performed using one-way ANOVA, and SNK and Games-Howell test was used for comparison between 2 groups. Results The mean linear intercept (MLI) in smoke-exposure group 1 and group 2 [ (64. 9 ± 5.3 ) μm, (77.9 ± 11.5 ) μm ] was higher than those in the control group 1 and group 2 [ (39. 0 ±3.8) μm, (40. 3±2. 7) μm], all P 〈0. 01. Compared with smoke-exposure group 2, the MLI in smoking cessation group (71.5 ±5.8)μm showed a lower value ( P 〈 0. 01 ), but still higher than that in smoke-exposure group 1 ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The IL-8 and TNF-α levels in BALF of smoke-exposure group 1 and group 2 [ (68± 17) ng/L, (85 ± 16) ng/L], [ ( 14. 1 ± 1.8)ng/L, (20. 1 ±8.7) ng/L] were higher than those in control group 1 and group 2 [ (44 ±8) ng/L, (43±9)ng/L], [(6.3 ±2.3) ng/L, (5.8±l.6)ng/L], all P〈0.05. The IL-8 and TNF-α levels were not statistically different between in smoking cessation group (56 ± 6)ng/L, (14. 7 ± 4.7 )ng/L and smoke-exposure group 1. The percentage of Treg in the lungs of smoke-exposure group 1 and group 2 [ (6. 6 ± 0. 8 ) % , (5.3 ± 0. 9) % ] was significantly decreased as compared to control group 1 and group 2 [ (9. 0 �
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...