检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡灵[1]
出 处:《法学论坛》2010年第5期95-99,共5页Legal Forum
摘 要:网络监督无疑已经成为中国民主进程中不可忽视的言语力量,网络监督在发挥巨大作用的同时,也体现出相当的局限和混乱——公法领域存在的弱化和局限以及私法领域表现出的行为与言语上的失范。有鉴于此,我国网络舆论监督应遵循一定的法律边界和相关原则。Public opinions on the Internet have become an indispensable power in China's democratic process.However,there are quite a lot chaos and confusion in this new way of supervision though it has been playing a vital part in our life.For instance,its weakness and limitation in public law and its non-standardized behavior and verbal forms in private law both reveal to us that there are a lot of problems in the internet supervision.On such basis,the present paper discusses the legal boundary of supervision by public opinion on the internet,and tries to propose some relevant principles,in the hope of promoting the protection of human rights and the progress of legislation on internet.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.171.178