检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺超[1] 罗宏 杨业兵[1] 唐军华[1] 刘旭峰[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学航空航天医学系心理学教研室 [2]武警昆明指挥学院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2010年第9期1131-1134,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的编制《反社会人格倾向评估问卷》(以下简称《问卷》),提供评价反社会人格倾向的有效测量工具及理论依据。方法采用定性与定量研究相结合的研究方式编制《问卷》,并用其对9718名正常被试和1347名青少年罪犯进行测试,评价其信度和效度。结果①探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析表明《问卷》具有良好的结构效度。反社会人格倾向组被试在《问卷》上的得分高于正常组,有显著性差异(P<0.01),验证了良好的区分效度;②品行问题、冲动控制、攻击倾向3个分量表的C ronbach'sα系数分为0.86、0.88、0.76;3个分量表重测信度分别为0.87、0.82、0.91,均具有显著性(P<0.01)。结论《反社会人格倾向评估问卷》具有较好的信度和效度,是评价反社会变态人格倾向的有效工具。Objective To develop an Anti-social Personality Risk Checklist,and provide effective measurements and theory basics for anti-social personality.Methods Using qualitative and quantitative investigate methods to develop Antisocial Personality Risk Checklist.Testing 1347 juvenile offenders and 9718 subjects with this checklist to get appraisal of its reliability and validity.Results ①It proved that this Checklist had effective validity by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor.The scores of experiment group were higher than those of control group,and they showed significant differences in this checklist(P0.01).②Cronbach's α coefficient of these three sub-scales were 0.86,0.88,0.76.Reliability of these three sub-scales were 0.87,0.82,0.91.All of them had statistics importance(P0.01).Conclusion Anti-social Personality Risk Checklist has effective reliability and validity and can be used as an effective tool in evaluating anti-social personality.
分 类 号:R174[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229