检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王彬[1,2]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]河南警察学院侦查系
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第5期733-738,共6页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
摘 要:随着科学技术的发展,技术侦查在犯罪侦查中的作用越来越重要。为此,不论是大陆法系国家还是英美法系国家大多通过立法对技术侦查的种类、适用范围、适用原则、审批程序以及侦查结果的保存使用进行了明确规定,以规范本国的技术侦查。在我国,一方面是技术侦查在立法上规定过于原则甚至缺失;另一方面是侦查实践中侦查机关大量使用技术侦查手段侦查刑事犯罪。因此,有必要研究并借鉴国外技术侦查立法的成功经验,以刑事诉讼法修改为契机,通过立法对技术侦查的相关问题加以明确规定。Along with the development of science and technology, the function of technical detection in crime detection is getting more and more important. For this reason, no matter in the country of the mainland legal system or that of the UK US legal system, the type of technical detection, the applicable scope, the applicable principle, the examination procedure as well as the keeping and use of detection result have been stipulated explicitly by the legislation mostly, so as to standard the technical detection of its own country. In our country, on the one hand, the technical detection has been stipulated too general and there even is flaws in the legislation, on the other hand, the methods of technical detection are used massively to detect the criminal offense by the investigating institution in the practice, therefore, it is necessary to study and profit from the successful experience of the legislation of technical detection overseas, taking the revision of the Law of Criminal Procedure as the turning point, to stipulate explicitly the technical detection' s related questions by the legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117