“宏观历史解释模式”及其批判  

"Macro-historical Interpretation Model" and Its Criticism

作　　者：张正明[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学哲学与公共管理学院,博士研究生黑龙江哈尔滨150080 [2]黑龙江省社科联

出　　处：《北方论丛》2010年第5期88-94,共7页The Northern Forum

摘　　要：历史解释模式与社会历史理论、史学范式、史学理论等概念意义相近又不完全相同;既紧密联系又有细微差别。所谓"历史解释模式"是指最一般的对历史的理解范式和解释框架,主要包括历史观和方法论。从哲学视角看,历史解释模式总体上可分为"宏观历史解释模式"、"微观历史解释模式"和文化哲学的历史解释模式。所谓宏观历史解释模式是指从社会历史宏观领域着眼,注重历史的"大结构、大过程、大比较",从人类活动的宏观领域去把握和解释历史,一般围绕历史的性质、有无规律、决定因素-动力系统、进步路线图等领域展开。The historical interpretation model has similar meaning with social history theory,paradigm,historiography,but are not identical same.The so-called ＂historical interpretation model＂ is the most common pattern of understanding and interpretation framework to history,including history and methodology.See from a philosophical perspective,it in general can be divided into ＂macro mode of historical interpretation＂,＂micro-historical interpretation model＂ and historical interpretation modelof cultural philosophy.The so-called macro-historical interpretation model is to see from the macro-social history,focusing on the ＂big structure,large processes,big comparison＂ of history,to grasp and explain the history from the macro-areas of human activity,focus on the nature,law,determining factor-power system and progressive line of history to expand.

关 键 词：历史解释模式 社会历史理论 宏观解释模式 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]