检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广东广州510275
出 处:《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2010年第5期42-47,共6页Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"政府绩效评估与公众参与研究"(10BGL078);教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"中国地方政府治理绩效评估研究"(06JJD630021);中山大学三期"211工程"项目"行政改革与政府治理研究"
摘 要:代议制是迄今为止实现主权在民理念的一种最好制度,但代议制存在内在缺陷。分析我国当前民主评议政风行风活动的内在逻辑,并回答为什么要开展民主评议政风行风活动这一重要理论基础问题是本文的立论基础。代议制的多重委托代理链条可能断裂,而民主评议政风行风的根本功能则是弥补代议制的缺陷。将党的职能部门和中央政府组成部门均纳入评议对象是民主评议政风行风活动的发展趋势。今后我们应加强对开展民主评议政风行风的实证研究,以促进我国民主评议政风行风活动水平的进一步提升。This paper analyzes the theoretic foundation of public deliberation on the work style and service quality in government and public sectors from the perspective of representative system and tries to answer the question "why" these activities are carried out and on what theories they are based.The representative system has been regarded as the best institution to realize the philosophy that government should be ruled by the people.However,there are many "defects" in the representative system which can be amended by public deliberation on the work style and service quality in the government and public sectors.Furthermore,the authors discuss the deficiency of the practices of public deliberation and try to provide a scope for undertaking empirical research to further inquire into the activities of public deliberation on the work style and service quality in government and public sectors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7