行政垄断行业高利润来源研究——高效率,还是垄断定价?  

The Study on the Source of High-Profit in Aministrative Monopoly Industries——High Efficiency,or Monopoly Pricing?

作　　者：丁启军[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学经济学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《产业经济研究》2010年第5期36-43,共8页Industrial Economics Research

基　　金：山东大学研究生自主创新基金:"基于规制视角的行业行政垄断问题研究"(项目编号:yzc09005);国家自然科学基金课题:"转轨经济条件下网络型产业竞争政策研究"(项目编号:70973066)

摘　　要：垄断行业的高收入问题早已引起社会的广泛关注,也成为国务院进一步深化改革的重点。然而,很多支持垄断行业高工资高福利的说法却应运而生,其中认为垄断行业的生产效率比一般行业高的"高效率"说影响最大。为了给国家垄断行业收入分配改革提供更多理论支持,本文探讨了垄断行业高利润的来源问题:中国的垄断行业基本是行政垄断行业;行政垄断与行业利润之间确实存在着正向关系;而三方面效率指标均显示,行政垄断并不能带来企业生产效率的提升;所以并不是企业高效率导致了高额利润,因而只能垄断定价的结果。The problem of high-income in monopoly industries has attractted widespread concern,also becomes the focus of the deepen reform of central goverment;however,many theories to support the high wages and high welfare have emerged,the most important of which is＂high efficiency theory＂that means the production efficiency is higher in monopoly industries than average industries.In order to give more theoretical support about the reform to improve the income distribution,this paper discussed the sources of high-profit： China＇s monopoly industries basically are administrative monopolies;a positive relationship between administrative monopoly an industrial profit exists indeed;while three efficiency indicators show that administrative monopoly can not bring the enhancement of efficiency;so it was not the high efficiency but only monopoly pricing that leads to high profits.

关 键 词：行政垄断行业 高收入 效率 政府规制 垄断定价 行政垄断 

分 类 号：F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]