袁枚对乾嘉诗坛学问化风气批评的矛盾性和妥协性  

Yuan Mei's Contradictions and Compromise in Criticizing the Scholastic Poetry during Qianlong and Jiaqing's Reign

作　　者：宁夏江[1] 魏中林[2] 

机构地区：[1]韶关学院文学院,广东韶关512000 [2]暨南大学文学院,广东广州510632

出　　处：《湖北民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第4期85-89,共5页Journal of Hubei Minzu University：Philosophy and Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目"晚清学人之诗研究"(项目编号09YJC751060);"中国古典诗歌学问化问题研究"(项目编号06JA750);广东省哲学社会科学2006年度规划项目(项目编号06J02)的部分成果

摘　　要：袁枚针对乾嘉诗坛学问化风气所露出的弊端,抗声提出诗主性灵,非关学问,反对在诗中填书塞典。但他又强调书笈典籍在诗歌中的重要作用,他的一部分诗歌也颇有书卷味。袁枚本欲纠治乾嘉诗坛以学填诗的流弊,然而在乾嘉学风和诗风的影响下,他对诗歌学问化做了一定程度的认同,他的批评表现出一定程度的矛盾性和妥协性。YUAN Mei,showing oppositions to cramming allusions into poetry,advocated that poetry came from poets′ epiphany rather than from their learning in terms of the defects of the scholastic poetry during Qianlong and Jialing′s reign.Yet he emphasized that it was still important to employ allusions in poetry which is a little scholastic,and he maintained that textual research,ancient code,records and allusions could be introduced into poetry only when poets could make full use of their imagination and creativity.Yuan Mei had thought that he could have cured the epidemic of cramming allusions into poetry,but,to certain extent,he identified himself with this scholastic poetry,so his criticism on this kind of poetry displayed his contradictory ideas and compromise.

关 键 词：袁枚 乾嘉诗坛 学问化风气 矛盾性 妥协性 

分 类 号：I207.22[文学—中国文学]