检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亮[1]
出 处:《嘉兴学院学报》2010年第5期121-125,共5页Journal of Jiaxing University
摘 要:由于犯罪及其行为个体的情况千差万别,因此刑罚应当是灵活而非僵硬的。伴随着刑罚轻缓化的趋势,短期自由刑的弊端日益显现,作为消弭短期自由刑不足的替代方案,易科罚金制度应运而生。从合理性、可行性、必要性的角度进行分析,易科罚金制度具备理论上的支撑。在制度设计上,应当对适用案件范围、程序启动模式、易科配比标准、法律救济途径等环节进行考量,从而通过构建易科罚金等相关司法制度,通达刑罚内在体系间的间隙,实现罪与罚之间的动态平衡。Due to the individuality of crimes and criminals, the punishment should be flexible. With the mitigation of penalty, the drawbacks of short time imprisonment gradually emerge. As an alternative for short time imprisonment, the fine commutableness has come into existence. From the perspectives of rationality, feasibility and necessity, this paper presents the idea that fine commutableness institution should be theoretically supported. When designing the system, applicable cases, procedure start - up mode, the ratio of fine to imprisonment and legal means of relief should be considered. Through constructing relative judicial institutions and making different penalties more closely connected, the dynamic balance of crime and punishment will be realized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117