法律殉道者之法律接受与抗拒的现代性反思——以苏格拉底与安提戈涅为例  

A Moderate Introspection upon Law Martyrs' Obeying and Disobeying Laws

作　　者：孙曙生[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院博士后流动站,江苏南京210004

出　　处：《北京行政学院学报》2010年第5期84-89,共6页Journal of Beijing administration institute

基　　金：江苏省人事厅2009年度"江苏省博士后科研资助计划"资助项目(0901098C)

摘　　要：在碰触到不符合正义本质的国家法律时,苏格拉底与安提戈涅做出了不同选择,前者服从,后者以死抗拒,显现出公民对国家法律所持的截然不同的态度。在建设法治国家的过程中,遵守法律、维护法的安定性是现代社会公民对国家的第一要务,但正当性接受亦是确立法治本质中的核心要素,二者不可偏废。Facing national laws that were against the nature of justice,Socrates and Antigone made different choices：the former chose to obey those laws;the latter to prefer to die rather than obey those laws,which demonstrated citizens＇ completely different attitudes toward national laws.In the process of building a country under the rule of law,while obeying laws and maintaining law＇s stability are the most important obligations of citizens in modern society;the legitimacy is a core factor of the rule of law.Therefore,neither of the two can be neglected.

关 键 词：法律的接受 法安定性 正当性 法治 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]