检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京100875
出 处:《改革》2010年第9期48-56,共9页Reform
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"终极产权;利益侵占与投资者权益保护"(批准号:09BJL023);教育部人文社会科学基金项目"次贷危机与公司治理--美国次贷危机对中国公司治理的启示"(批准号:09YJA630010)
摘 要:国际金融危机的爆发凸显金融监管治理的重要性。现阶段专门针对我国的金融监管治理进行系统量化评估的研究尚不多见。通过借鉴国际经验并融入独立设计的指标,总计4个纬度47个指标,针对我国银行业构建了金融监管治理评估指标体系。评估结果显示,我国银行业监管治理已具备良好监管治理的形式,但也存在不足,需要从独立性、责任性、透明度和监管操守四个方面加强监管治理。hltemational financial crisis has shown the importance of financial regulatory govemance. However, there are few studies that carry out quantitative assessment on financial regulatory gnvemance specially for China. On the base of international experience and some independently designed indicators, this paper designs 4 latitudes which totally include 47 indicators, and constructs China's banking regulatory governance assessment indicator system. The assessment results indicate that China's banking regulatory gnvemance has had a good regulatory governance form except some shortcomings. Thus, China should strengthen banking regulatory governance from four aspects, such as independence, accountability, transparency and integrity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171