孙权攻陷皖城献疑  

Doubts on Sun Quan Capturing Wan

作　　者：郭秀琦[1] 

机构地区：[1]包头师范学院图书馆,内蒙古包头014030

出　　处：《阴山学刊》2010年第4期63-66,共4页Yinshan Academic Journal

基　　金：内蒙古自治区高等学校科学技术研究项目<三国史料研究>(NJ309154)部分研究成果

摘　　要：《三国志.吴主传》中有关汉献帝建安十九年(214年)五月吴主孙权亲自带兵攻下汉魏重镇皖城和建安十四年(209年)汉魏"合肥以南惟有皖城"的记载有误。孙氏占据皖城是从建安四年(199年)八月开始,孙策乘袁术署任的庐江太守刘勋不备,袭取了庐江郡治皖城。以后皖城一直为孙吴所占据,直至西晋咸宁四年(278年)方失守。因此,汉魏"合肥以南惟有皖城"的提法也不能成立。《三国志》出现皖城陈述失误的根本原因,是对"屯皖"理解有误。不能把"屯皖"理解为军队驻扎在皖城,如果朱光占领了皖城及附近地区,这一地区就不应再叫庐江郡,因为汉魏已设置了一个庐江郡治寿春。这说明对皖城正确的理解应是在皖城地区屯垦。214年孙权所攻打的皖城,就是朱光南下军团的总部,这一地名和皖有一定的联系,逐渐被人淡忘,讹传为皖城。There are some errors in the records about Sun Quan leading troops to capture the main city of Wan in May 214 and ＂City of Wan is the only city in the south of Hefei＂ in 209 in ＂Three kingdoms＂.Suns＇ occupation of the city of Wan started in April 199.Sun Ce attacked Zhiwan City successfully while Lujiang who was the prefect of Lujiang appointed by Yuanshu made no preparation.From then on the city of Wan was occupied by Wu till 276.Thus the saying that ＂City of Wan is the only city in the south of Hefei＂ can not be true.The misjudging of the city of Wan is fundamentally results from the different understanding of ＂Tun Wan＂.We can not hold the idea that the Army was cantonment at the city of Wan.If Zhu Guang had occupied the city of Wan and its vicinity,the region could not be called Lujiang.In the year of 214,the city attacked by Sun Quan was the headquarters of Zhu Guang corps and the place name was linked with the name of Wan but had been forgot by people and finally it was recoded as Wan incorrectly.

关 键 词：《三国志》 吕蒙 皖城 “屯皖” 

分 类 号：K236.07[历史地理—历史学]