检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]平度市人民医院,山东平度266700 [2]平度市卫生局卫生监督所,山东平度266700
出 处:《基层医学论坛》2010年第28期867-868,共2页The Medical Forum
摘 要:目的比较分析螺钉固定与胫腓骨钩固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2000年7月—2009年7月手术治疗并获得随访的38例下胫腓联合损伤患者的临床资料。其中螺钉内固定26例,胫腓钩内固定12例,根据美国足与踝关节外科协会踝与后足功能评分(AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale)标准对其术后疗效进行评定。结果所有患者随访6个月,拉力螺钉固定组取出螺钉时间为术后8周~12周,优10例,良7例,可6例,差3例,其中有2例患者术后11周发现螺钉断裂,优良率为65.4%;胫腓骨钩固定组取出胫腓骨钩时间为8周~12周,优8例,良3例,可1例,优良率为91.7%.结论下胫腓联合损伤时采用胫腓钩固定的效果要好于螺钉固定。Objective To analyze the effect of the fibula hooks and screws internal fixation.Methods The data of 38 patients of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury whom were treated in our hospital between 2000 and 2009 were reviewed.12 cases were chosen randomly from fibula hooks internal fixation group as"observed group"and 26 cases of screws internal fixation group as"control group".AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale were used to analyze the effect.Results After 6 months follow-up,the bolt unloading time after 8~12 weeks.10 cases was excellent,7 good,6 effective and 3 ineffective.There were 2 cases bolt broken after 11 weeks.the rate of excellent and good was65.4% in the Screw internal fixation group.Fibula hook unloading time was 8~12 weeks.8 cases was excellent,3 good,1 effective and 3 ineffective.The rate of excellent and good was 91.7% in the fibula hook internal fixation group.Conclusion fibula hooks is more excellent than screws in the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222