检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周红[1] 陈世容[1] 王益芳[1] 殷鸿[1] 邓明珍[1]
出 处:《肿瘤预防与治疗》2010年第5期421-423,共3页Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
摘 要:目的:观察振动排痰机辅助排痰方法对食管癌三切口手术患者疼痛和排痰效果的影响。方法:将60例食管癌三切口手术患者随机分为对照组和观察组,两组术后均在常规抗感染、祛痰和吸氧、雾化吸入的同时,分别采用人工叩背和振动排痰机排痰治疗,观察及评估两组患者排痰后切口疼痛程度(NRS),排痰量及胸部X片表现。结果:观察组NRS测定平均值显著低于对照组(P<0.05);两组排痰量和肺不张的发生率具有显著差异。结论:食管癌三切口术后患者使用振动排痰机辅助排痰对患者伤口疼痛影响小,排痰效果明显,有效地防治了肺部并发症的发生,促进了患者早日康复。Objective: To evaluate the effects of vibration-assisted expectoration in the postoperative care of esophageetomy with three incisions. Methods: 60 patients with esophageal cancer accepted three incisions esophagectomy were randomly divided into control group and observation group. All patients received anti-inflammatory, expectorant treatment, neb nebulised medication and oxygen inhalation. Vibration-assisted expectoration was applied on the observation group, while the control group got expectoration by human labor. The two groups were assessed by incision pain (NRS), expectoration volume and chest X-ray. Results: NRS determination of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group ( P 〈 0. 05). Two groups showed significant differences in expectoration volume and the incidence of atelectasis. Conclusion: Esophageal cancer patients accepted three incisions esophagectomy get less wound pain, more obvious expectoration effect, less pulmonary complications and earlier recovery by vibrationassisted expectoration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117