灾后救援人员替代性创伤与应对方式的相关研究  

Correlative Study on Vicarious Traumatization and Coping Style among Rescuers

作　　者：李丽娜[1] 陈晓美[1] 晏丽娟[1] 李建明[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国华北煤炭医学院心理学系,唐山063000

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2010年第10期1188-1190,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

摘　　要：目的调查灾后救援人员替代性创伤和应对方式状况,并分析二者的相关性。方法采用灾难救助者替代性创伤问卷和特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)对唐山市205名赴四川抗震救灾人员进行调查分析。结果 1性别、婚姻状况不同的救援人员在替代性创伤总分上无显著差异(P>0.05);接受过培训的救援人员其替代性创伤总分显著低于未接受过培训的救援人员(t=-2.329,P<0.05);2救援人员积极应对得分显著高于常模(t=7.868,P<0.001),消极应对得分与常模无显著差异;3除生活信念因子外,替代性创伤总分及其他各因子与积极应对方式呈显著负相关(P<0.05或P<0.01);替代性创伤总分及其各因子与消极应对方式呈显著正相关(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论 1替代性创伤不受性别、婚姻状况的影响,但受是否接受培训的影响;救援人员应对机制良好;2替代性创伤与应对方式的2个因子相关密切。Objective To investigate rescuers＇ vicarious traumatization（VT） and coping style,as well as analyze the correlation between the two.Methods A total of 205 earthquake rescuers went to Sichuan were assessed with Vicarious Traumatization Scale and Trait of Coping Style Questionnaire in Tang shan city.Results ①Gender,marital status of the rescuers in the VT total score had no significant difference（P0.05）;VT score of rescuers receiving train was significantly lower than no trained rescuers（t=-2.329,P0.05）.②Rescuers＇ positive coping score was significantly higher than the norm（t=7.868,P0.001）,negative coping score had no significantly different with norm.③In addition to living faith factor,the VT total score and other factors had significantly negatively correlated with positive coping style（P0.05 or P0.01）;the VT total score and all factors had significantly positively correlated with negative coping style（P0.05 or P0.01）.Conclusion ①Gender,marital status had no significant effect on rescuers＇ VT,receiving relevant training or had no significant effect on rescuers＇ VT;Rescuers had good coping mechanisms.②VT had close relation with two factors of coping style.

关 键 词：救援人员 替代性创伤 应对方式 

分 类 号：R135[医药卫生—劳动卫生]