《文选》不录齐梁赋辨  

Analysis of Qi Liang Fu not in Wenxuan

作　　者：胡大雷[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第5期48-52,共5页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：广西"人文强桂"建设工程项目"文选研究"(桂科软051110011)

摘　　要：宋齐时代,诗歌有了极大发展,但沈约《宋书.谢灵运传论》讨论文学仍视赋为文学主体,梁时《文选》列赋于首位,是有文学史依据的。但《文选》不录齐梁赋,却有其特殊原因。如果以《文选》赋十五类一一对照齐梁赋,齐梁赋确实没有好作品可录入者,只有沈约《郊居赋》尚可。《郊居赋》可属《文选》赋"志"类,但沈约《郊居赋》与"志"类潘岳《闲居赋》,意思有重复之处;且《郊居赋》又有怨梁武帝之嫌,那么不录也是情理之中的。齐梁时代赋作有自己的特点,主要是崇尚赋的诗化,或是文体形式上的半诗半赋,或是文体内涵上的抒情。作为梁朝文论三派的正统派,萧统鄙视这样的作品;另外,萧统时,这类赋作正在兴起,《文选》未录这样的作品也是理所当然的。Though poetry had made great progress in Song and Qi dynasties, there was still literary historical basis that fu （descriptive prose interspersed with verse） was regarded as the mainstay of literature, as seen in Song Book： Biography of Xie Ling-yun by Shen Yue and Fu was ranked the first place in Wenxuan of Liang dynasty. There are special reasons why Qi Liang Fu was not included in Wenxuan. In comparison with the 15 types of fu in Wenxuan, there is really not good works to be selected from Qi Liang Fu, except Shen Yue＇ s Jiao Ju Fu. Jiao Ju Fu could be classified in the type of Zhi in Wenxuan, but there are some repetitions with Pan Yue＇s Xian Ju Fu of the same type. Besides, there are some complaints about Emperor Wu of Liang dynasty, so it is reasonable that it is not included in Wenxuan. The fu of Qi and Liang dynasties have their own features ： mainly upholding poetic quality of fu, with a style of half poetry and half fu or stylistic lyricism. As the traditional orthodox in the three groups of Liang literary theory, Xiao Tong despised these works. In addition, this kind of fu was on the rise at that time. it stands to reason that it is not included in Wenxuan.

关 键 词：文选 沈约 郊居赋 齐梁赋 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]