检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘万明[1]
出 处:《云南财经大学学报》2010年第5期67-74,共8页Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:金融转型是转轨国家经济转轨的核心。在"华盛顿共识"的影响下,金融自由化和银行业私有化构成了中东欧和独联体国家金融转型的核心内容。虽然面临着共同的历史起点,但是中东欧和独联体国家的金融转型,却沿着并不完全相同的路径演进,国家之间金融转型进程的差距也比较显著。作为分别属于不同区域层次和国家层次上的金融转型的先进典型,中欧和波罗的海国家、匈牙利提供了宝贵的经验启示,而作为落后的典型,中亚5国和俄罗斯也提供了有益的教训。Financial transformation is the core of economic transition. Strongly influenced by the "Washington Consensus", the core contents of the financial transformation countries of the Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) consist of financial liberalization and banking privatization. Although the CEE and the CIS countries have similar starting point of history, their financial transformation paths are not exactly the same, and there is significant evolution gap between the two groups of countries. As the advanced models of financial transformation at the regional level and the country level respectively, middle European and Baltic countries, and Hungary have provided us with valuable experience and enlightenment. Meanwhile, as the backward model, the five central Asian countries and Russia also give beneficial lessons to us.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.15.153