检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学热泵空调技术研究所,哈尔滨150090 [2]国核电力规划设计研究院,北京100094 [3]新疆市政建筑设计研究院有限公司,乌鲁木齐830092
出 处:《制冷学报》2010年第5期18-23,共6页Journal of Refrigeration
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划(2006BAJ03A05)资助项目~~
摘 要:为了充分利用地源热泵的节能特性和辅助热源较低的初投资,针对新疆某市的气象条件和价格体系,通过实例模拟研究了地源热泵+燃气锅炉供热方式的节能特性和经济性。结果表明,对于地源热泵+燃气锅炉供热方式,设计负荷按60%+40%分配时,不会显著增加燃料耗量,但可以获得最佳的经济效果。此时,燃气锅炉的供热量仅占总供热量的8.3%,总标煤耗量仅比热泵承担100%设计负荷方案增加5.22%,而却可以获得最小的费用现值(249.3元/m2)和最大的增量净现值(47.8元/m2)。Ground source heat pumps(GSHPs) have advantages such as energy-saving and lower initial cost of auxiliary heat source.In this study, the characteristics of energy saving and economy of a GSHP with a gas boiler were investigated by numerical simulation and case study according to the weather data and fuel prices at a city in Xinjiang.The results show that if the design heating load of the GSHP and the gas boiler was 60% and 40%, respectively, the source energy consumption did not increase significantly, however, the best economy was achieved.In the case studied, the heat output of the gas boiler was only 8.3% of the total, and the total coal equivalent increased by only 5.22% compared with that in the case of 100% design heating load supplied by the GSHP, while the smallest present value of cost (249.3 Yuan/m2) and the largest incremental net present value (47.8 Yuan/m2) were acquired.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.100.195