检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《生态与农村环境学报》2010年第5期430-435,共6页Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2004CB719706)
摘 要:计算了秸秆基建筑保温材料的年节能量,并与等量秸秆用作燃料释放的热量进行对比;估算了秸秆基建筑保温材料的CO2减排量;对秸秆基建筑保温材料和发泡聚苯乙烯(EPS)材料生产过程的能耗、CO2排放量和经济性进行对比分析。结果表明,秸秆用于建筑保温在采暖期节能约可高达51 MJ.kg-1.a-1,明显高于其直接用作燃料所释放的热量(7.1~16.7 MJ.kg-1)。若中国北方农村有10万户居民应用特定的秸秆基建筑保温材料,10a的CO2减排量将达到1 600万t以上。在达到相同保温效果情况下,秸秆基材料生产过程中的总能耗和CO2排放量均低于EPS材料,经济性也优于EPS材料。因此,宜在中国北方农村地区大力推广秸秆基建筑保温材料。How much energy the use of the straw-based building insulation material(SBBIM) in question might save annually was calculated and how much CO2 emission might be reduced by the use was estimated against the heat the burning of the equivalent amount of straws might release.A comparison analysis was conducted of SBBIM and expandable polystyrene(EPS) in energy consumption,CO2 emissions and economy during their production processes.Used as building insulation,straw could save as much as 51 MJ·kg-1·a-1,significantly higher than the energy it released as fuel(7.1~16.7 MJ·kg-1);if 100 000 rural households in North China are to use the SBBIM,it may reduce CO2 emission by 16 million tons or more in 10 years.Being the same in heat insulation effect,SBBIM consumes less energy and emits less CO2 than EPS in production,but overmatches EPS in economy.It is,therefore,concluded that it is advisable to extrapolate the technology of using straw as building insulation material in the broad rural area of North China.
关 键 词:秸秆 建筑保温材料 节能 CO2减排 发泡聚苯乙烯
分 类 号:TU111.4[建筑科学—建筑理论] X712[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15