检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢海英[1] 阎成美[2] 王爱民[2] 彭山玲[3] 谢志红[1] 翁建莲[1] 王丽娟[4]
机构地区:[1]南京军区福州总医院肝胆外科 [2]南京军区福州总医院护理部 [3]南京军区福州总医院培训中心 [4]南京军区福州总医院手术室
出 处:《福州总医院学报》2010年第2期67-68,共2页Journal of Fuzhou General Hospital
基 金:军队"十一五"专项课题(06Z078)
摘 要:目的:探讨卫生列车后送伤员中提高留置导尿术操作时效的有效方法。方法:采用常规法和快速法对外科88名男性手术患者实施留置导尿术,对两种方法所用的时间和插入导尿管前尿道口黏膜细菌培养结果进行对比。结果:快速法留置导尿术较常规法用时缩短678-70s,占全程总用时的四分之一;插入导尿管前尿道口黏膜细菌培养结果无差异;节省耗材成本占总成本的四分之一。结论:快速法留置导尿术操作用于卫生列车后送伤员,既可提高操作时效,保证消毒效果,也可节约耗材成本。Objective: To investigate an effective method for enhancing the operative efficiency of urethral catheterization in wounded soldiers during the transportation of medical train. Method: Routine and fast urethral catheterization techniques were 1employed in 88 patients whom received operation. Compared the time and becterial culture in mucosa of urethral orifice before catheter insertion by the two techniques. Results: The time for fast urethral eatheterlzation was significantly shortened from 67 to 70 seconds compared with the routine technique. It only took 25 percent of the whole time to compllsh the operation. There was no significant difference in bacterial culture in mucosa of urethral otifiee before catheter insertion between technlques.and saving materials placed 25 percent of the gross cost. Condas'lon: Fast urethral catheterization increase operative e/fidency, ensure effectiveness of sterilisation and save the cost, which is more appropriate for wounded soldiers during the transportation of medical train.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.105.128