气管插管不同方向置入喉镜片成功率的对比观察  

Contrast observation of tracheal intubation success ratio seting a laryngoscope lens into mouth in different direction

作　　者：彭博[1] 李喆[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古自治区巴彦淖尔市医院,015000

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2010年第28期237-238,共2页China Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的为了比较气管插管时口腔正中(改进法)和右侧置入喉镜片(经典法)两种不同方法的插管成功率。方法将2009年应用改进法气管插管的患者30例与2008年的经典法插管患者28例作了回顾对照研究。结果两种方法的气管插管的成功率分别是:30/30和26/28,改进法具有许多优点。结论在一般情况下,气管插管时可采用口腔正中置入喉镜片法。Objective To compare the tracheal intubation success ratio between inseting a laryngoscope into mouth form middle（improvement method） and right（classical method）.Methods Review comparison research between the patient 30 cases which tracheal intubation using inprovement method in 2009 and 28 cases with classical method in 2008.Results The success rate of two tracheal intubation methods respectively is：30/30 and 26/28,the improvement method have many merits.Conclusion The ordinary circumstances,using the method inseting laryngoscope lens into mouth from middle for tracheal intubation.

关 键 词：气管插管 喉镜片 方向 成功率 

分 类 号：R459.7[医药卫生—急诊医学]