检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学中国少数民族语言文学学院,北京100081
出 处:《语言研究》2010年第4期1-8,共8页Studies in Language and Linguistics
摘 要:本文通过藏缅语与汉语选择疑问句的比较,指出在句法结构的共时平面上二者同中有异,在句法结构的历时演变上二者的演变链大致相同。从藏缅语反观汉语,汉语选择疑问句的演变链应该可以再向前延伸,其初始形式是无标记的选择问句和无标记的正反问句。如果将汉语方言纳入研究视野,则汉语选择疑问句的演变链还可以向后延伸,有可能发展出重叠问句。制约选择疑问句句法结构演变的因素是语言类型的特点和各个语言系统的特点。Through contrastive study, this article points out that there are similarities with differences at the synchronic layer in syntax structures of the two languages while in the evolution chain of diachronic evolution, the syntax structures of the two languages are of approximate sameness. The article argues that reviewing Chinese from the Tibetan-Burmese language, evolution chain of the Chinese alternative interrogative sentence could be possibly extended backward further, its primary form could be the non-marked alternative interrogative sentences and the non-marked disjunctive interrogative sentences. If the Chinese dialects were put into consideration, the evolution chain of Chinese alternative interrogative sentences could be extended forward and could have the possibility of developing into overlapped interrogative sentence. The article also argues that the factors that confine the syntax structure of alternative interrogative sentences arc the feature of language typology and the feature of each language systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3