实践本体论的悖谬与马克思主义哲学范式转型  

Paradox of Practical Ontology and Paradigm Transformation of Marxist Philosophy

作　　者：孙亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学价值与文化研究中心,北京100875

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第4期9-15,共7页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：孙亮主持的中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目:"政治哲学视域中的后马克思主义阶级理论研究"(2009AAP-4)的阶段性成果

摘　　要："实践本体论"命意之中的"存在即是被实践"与"存在即是被认识"具有高度相关性,它们实质在于指向了超越"哲学基本问题"。基于这一点,可以将"实践本体论"置放在目前哲学界"主客统一"的马克思主义哲学范式转型框架内加以审读。此种转型所呈现出的样态是,指责"传统教科书哲学范式"为实体本体论、转型的实质是试图悬置"哲学基本问题"展开各种言说、在拒斥"主客二分"的思维方式过程中,寻求内蕴"主客统一"的"存在"。显然,"实践本体论"与此种范式转型具有"家族相似性"。对此,深入到认识论循环中的本体论困境,在马克思哲学文本中确认"存在论前提"的优先性,确认任何试图超越"哲学基本问题"都是对马克思主义哲学的"偏离"。这样一来,整个目前的马克思主义哲学范式转型与"实践本体论"的倡导者不仅在本体论中寻求马克思主义哲学革命的意义的判断是有问题的,而且在"哲学之内"理解马克思哲学变革本身就是路径错误。应该在"哲学之外"透视马克思哲学革命问题,依此之故,"面向中国问题"的马克思主义哲学范式转型成为了必然的"出场路径"。＂ Existence is to be practiced＂,which belongs to ＂practical ontology＂,is highly relevant to ＂existence is to be recognized＂.The essence of them lies in translating basic questions of philosophy.Therefore,practical ontology may be interpreted in the frame of paradigm transformation of Marxist philosophy.This transformation criticizes traditional textbook philosophy paradigm as entity ontology and its essence is attempting to develop all kinds of doctrines by surmounting basic philosophy questions and searching an existence which can unify subject and object.We should penetrate into ontology difficulties in epistemology circulation,confirm the ontological priority in Marxist text and point out any attempt to surmount basic philosophy questions deviating Marxist philosophy.Therefore,all the advocates of practical ontology and paradigm transformation of Marxist philosophy have got the wrong judgment on searching the meaning of Marxist philosophical revolution.

关 键 词：哲学范式转型 实践本体论 中国问题 出场路径 

分 类 号：B016[哲学宗教—哲学理论]