火针治疗褥疮疗效观察  

Clinical research on bedsores treated with fire needle therapy

作　　者：阎翠兰[1] 刘清军[1] 杨鹏[1] 付爱军[1] 朱军[1] 王会还 

机构地区：[1]华北煤炭医学院附属医院神经外科,河北唐山063000 [2]开滦集团有限公司医院,唐山063001

出　　处：《中国针灸》2010年第10期819-821,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

基　　金：河北省中医药管理局科研审批项目:2008134

摘　　要：目的:对比火针与毫针针刺治疗褥疮的临床疗效,探讨治疗褥疮的最佳方法。方法:将54例褥疮患者随机分为火针组和针刺组,每组27例。火针组给予火针针刺治疗,针刺组给予毫针针刺治疗,均针刺疮面及疮周阿是穴,观察两组疗效及不同分期患者所需治疗疗程。结果:火针组疗效满意率为91.4%(53/58),针刺组为75.9%(41/54),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组褥疮Ⅲ和Ⅳ期患者的疗程数较Ⅱ期患者显著增加(均P<0.05),火针组Ⅲ和Ⅳ期患者的疗程较针刺组明显缩短(P<0.05)。结论:火针治疗褥疮疗效优于普通针刺,是治疗褥疮的较佳方法。Objective To discuss the clinical efficacy of fire needle therapy on bedsores. Methods Fifty-four cases of bedsores were divided randomly into a fire needling group and a filiform needling group, 27 cases in each one. In fire needling group, fire needle therapy was applied. In fifliform needling group, common needling technique with filiform needle was adopted. The wound surface and Ashi points around the sores were punctured in either group. The efficacy and the treatrhent session required in different phases were observed in two groups. Results The satis- factory rate of the efficacy was 91.4% （53/58） in fire needling group and was 75. 9% （41/54） in common needling group, indicating statistical significant difference in comparison （P〈0.05）. The sessions in the phases Ⅲ and Ⅳ of bedsores increased significantly as compared with those in the phase Ⅱ of two groups （both P〈0.05）, of which, the sessions in phases Ⅲ and IV of fire needling group were shortened apparently as compared with those of filiform needling group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The efficacy of the fire needling therapy is superior to that of common needling on bedsores, and it is an effective approach to bedsores.

关 键 词：火针 褥疮 针刺疗法 

分 类 号：R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]