检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院第一附属医院急诊科ICU,云南昆明650032
出 处:《昆明医学院学报》2010年第9期13-15,共3页Journal of Kunming Medical College
基 金:云南省自然科学基金资助项目(2008ZC120M)
摘 要:目的比较2%丙泊酚与1%丙泊酚两者对危重症患者血清瘦素(Leptin)的影响.方法 60例APACHEⅡ评分≥16分的危重病人作为研究对象,随机分成两组,每组30人;A组输注2%丙泊酚,B组输注1%丙泊酚,用BIS监护仪控制镇静水平,Bis值控制在60到80之间,采用放射免疫法检测治疗前后血清瘦素水平,记录患者第6、12、24、48、72 h的血清瘦素值.结果 A组患者血清瘦素水平明显低于B组.结论 2%丙泊酚临床安全性明显高于1%丙泊酚.Objective To compare the effects of 2% propofol and 1% propofol on the serum leptin levels of critically ill patients.Method Sixty critical patients with APACHEⅡscale≥16 were studied.Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups:A group and B group,30 patients in each group.Patients in A group received 2%propofol and in B group received 1% propofol.The sadation level was controlled with 60 to 80 on BIS monitor.The radioimmunoassay was used to detect the serum leptin levels before and after treatment,and the serum leptin levels at the first 6,12,24,48,72 hour were recorded.Result The serum leptin levels of patients in A group were significantly lower than those in B group.Conclusion The clinical safety of 2% propofol is significantly better than 1% propofol.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40