检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海医科大学中山医院心脏外科,上海市心血管病研究所,200032
出 处:《中国临床医学》1999年第2期143-144,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:微创冠状动脉搭桥术可减少体外循环引起的并发症,患者术后疼痛轻,恢复快,出血输血少,住院时间短,医疗费用低。方法:自1998年8月至1999年4月采用前胸正中切口,应用左胸廓内动脉、双侧胸廓内动脉和大隐静脉为12例冠心病患者施行微创冠状动脉搭桥术,占同期冠状动脉搭桥术22%。年龄45~80岁(平均65岁),左室射血分数23%~69%(平均47%),平均搭桥2.1根。结果:平均ICU时间和住院时间分别为1~2d(平均1.2d)和12~20d(平均12d)术后平均6d出院,较同期常规冠状动脉搭桥术短(P<0.05)。胸腔引流量和输血分别为280~750ml(平均415ml),0~600ml(平均160ml),较同期常规冠状动脉搭桥术少(P<0.05)。11例手术存活,1例死于呼吸衰竭。短期随访(1~8个月)患者心绞痛症状消失,活动量增加。2例患者术后2个月随访冠脉造影,吻合口满意率100%。结论:微创冠状动脉搭桥术安全、经济、有效,并可应用于多支血管病变,值得推广应用。Objective: Minimal invasive coronary bypass surgery decreases the complication associated with cardiopulmonary bypass, alleviates postoperative pain, promotes recovery, and is economical. Methods: From August 1998 to April 1999, twelve patients underwent minimal invasive coronary bypass surgery with LIMA, bilateral mammary artery, and saphenous vein grafts through medial sternotomy. This accounted for 22 % patients of all candidates for coronary bypass surgery. Patient's age rang is 45 to 80 (average 65) yearsold, and left ventricular ejection fraction is between 23 % to 69 % (average 47 % ). The average graft is 2. 1 per case. Results: The average ICU and hospital stay were 1. 2 and 12 days, respectively, shorter than conventional coronary bypass surgery (p < 0. 05). Patients are usually discharged 5 ~6 days postoperatively. The average chest drainage and blood trans fusion were 415 ml and 160 ml, respectively, less than conventional bypass surgery (p < 0.05). Eleven patients survived from surgery. One patient died one week postoperatively from respiratory dysfunction due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All survived patients have no symptoms of angina for short - term follow - up (1 to 8 months). Two patients were followed up with postoperative coronary angiogram 2 month later. 100 % satisfaction of anastomosis. Conclusious: Minimal invasive coronary bypass surgery is more safe, economical and effective than conventional coronary bypass surgery. It can be used for multivascular diseases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15