检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州市公安局安康医院司法鉴定科,浙江杭州311113
出 处:《全科医学临床与教育》2010年第5期516-518,521,共4页Clinical Education of General Practice
摘 要:目的探讨精神病人盗窃行为特征与责任能力评定中相关性。方法采用自行设计"盗窃案件司法精神病鉴定资料调查表"对2008年1月至2009年12月份本院司法鉴定的盗窃案件资料72例进行调查。结果72例盗窃案中,无精神病盗窃13例(18.16%),均评定为完全责任能力;各种精神障碍盗窃59例(81.94%),其中责任能力评定为完全责任能力31例(52.54%)、部分责任能力17例(28.81%)、无责任能力11例(18.65%)。作案行为特征中以作案时间、地点、对象、工具、动机、计划性、罪错认识、行为隐蔽性、潜逃、自我保护与责任能力评定结果呈明显相关(r分别=0.54、-0.54、-0.53、0.51、-0.57、0.56、0.60、0.67、0.50、0.69,P均<0.05)。结论对盗窃案件行为特征的分析,评判当时辨认能力和控制能力的损害程度,可作为法学要件辨认能力和控制能力评定的参考依据。Objective To explore the correlation between characteristic of theft behavior and responsibility in patients with psychosis disease.Methods Using self-designed sheet to survey 72 cases of theft.Results Of the 72 cases,13 cases(18.16%) were without psychosis disease and classified as complete responsibility;59 cases(81.94%) had various mental disorders,among which 31 cases(52.54%) had complete responsibility,17 patients(28.81%) had partly responsibility and 11 cases(18.65%) had no responsible capacity.Commit crimes time,place,object,tools,motivation,planning,wrong understanding of crime,acts of concealment,flight,and self-protection ability showed significant correlation with responsibility assessing results(r=0.54,-0.54,-0.53,0.51,-0.57,0.56,0.60,0.67,0.50,0.69,P 0.05).Conclusions Analysis of the theft behavior characteristics could be a reference in assessing the cognitive and control ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28