关于建立案例指导制度的必要性  

Imperative to establish a system of case guidance in China

作　　者：曹守晔 

机构地区：[1]最高人民法院应用法学研究所

出　　处：《中国法律（中英文版）》2010年第5期13-13,69,70,共3页China Law

摘　　要：近日，备受关注的罗彩霞案尘埃落定。在本案中，被告律师认为原告主张的精神损害赔偿数额过大，并提供了此前其他法院审结的类似案例予以说明。在此类侵权案件中，争议的一个焦点是精神损害赔偿的数额，但法律没有对赔偿数额给出答案，也不可能有答案。对于法官来说，赔偿数额是其自由裁定权的范围，而被告代理人提供的案例，The widely-publicized case of Luo Caixia - a notorious identity theft case in which a former police officer was found to have helped his daughter enroll university under the name of her classmate - was eventually settled through mediation recently. In this case, the defense lawyer argued that the amount of compensation for spiritual damage claimed by the plaintiff was too big,

关 键 词：案例指导制度 损害赔偿数额 精神损害赔偿 尘埃落定 侵权案件 裁定权 代理人 被告 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]