检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:泮晓华[1] 薛雷[1] 涂杰楠[1] 王媛媛[1] 韩超[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院工程地质力学重点实验室中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,北京100029
出 处:《工程勘察》2010年第11期1-5,共5页Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
基 金:"十一五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目(编号2008BAJ06B01)
摘 要:为了验证疏排桩锚—土钉墙水平联合支护结构的稳定、安全及可行性,得出桩、锚等结构构件的受力及变形规律,以北京京温市场二期地下车库基坑工程为例,分别构建了桩锚支护和疏排桩锚—土钉墙水平联合支护两种方案,然后对两种方案进行了数值模拟,并将以下方面的模拟结果进行了对比分析:基坑开挖面水平位移、地面沉降、各道锚杆的轴向受力规律及支护桩的受弯规律。模拟结果表明:当基坑土层适合土钉支护但开挖深度超过土钉支护深度时,采用疏排桩锚—土钉墙水平联合支护结构替代桩锚支护结构是稳定的、安全的、可行的。In order to verify the stability,safety and feasibility of scattered row pile-anchor and soil-nailed wall level composite support structure,obtain force and deformation law of piles,anchor and other structural elements,taking underground garage foundation pit of Beijing Jingwen Market as an example,two kinds of supporting programs are constructed,one is scattered row pile-anchor and soil-nailed wall level composite support program,and the other is pile-anchor support program,then the two programs are simulated.The following simulation results are compared such as excavation surface horizontal displacement,ground subsidence,the law of axial force of different anchor and the bending moment of support pile.The results show that when soil nailing is suitable for the soil,but excavation depth is deeper than what soil nailing can do,scattered row pile-anchor and the soil-nailed wall level composite support structure used as a alternative of pile-anchor support structure is safe and feasible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.113.73